Redundancy arises when a business no longer requires a particular role or needs fewer employees to do a specific type of work. Employment law and redundancy are closely connected because the legal framework determines whether the process is fair and compliant. If an employer handles redundancy incorrectly, it can lead to unfair dismissal claims and costly legal disputes.
Employers may need to make redundancies due to economic downturns, restructuring, relocation, or closure of parts of the business. These are all legitimate reasons, but they must align with fair procedures under UK employment law.
As an employer, I must ensure the redundancy process follows a legally compliant approach. This includes identifying a genuine redundancy situation, consulting with affected employees, and applying objective selection criteria. Employment law does not prohibit redundancy, but it demands transparency, fairness, and procedural accuracy.
Dismissals that appear to be redundancy but actually relate to performance or conduct issues will not meet the legal definition. Similarly, selecting employees for redundancy based on discriminatory reasons – such as age, gender, or disability – breaches the Equality Act and puts the business at serious risk.
By understanding the link between employment law and redundancy, employers protect both their legal standing and their reputation. This helps maintain staff trust and reduces the risk of tribunal claims.
Employment law and redundancy both demand strict compliance with legal procedures. I always advise employers to follow a structured and documented process when handling redundancies. You must consult with affected employees, provide adequate notice, and apply fair selection criteria. Failing to follow procedure increases the likelihood of tribunal claims.
Employers must adopt measurable, justifiable criteria when selecting employees for redundancy. This could include skills, qualifications, disciplinary record, or performance. I ensure my clients score each criterion consistently across all employees in the selection pool.
You must consult individually with affected employees, and where 20 or more employees are at risk, you must conduct collective consultation. Employers must inform and consult with recognised trade unions or employee representatives. The law also sets minimum timeframes for these consultations.
Employees with two or more years of service have a legal right to statutory redundancy pay. You must also provide the correct notice period or pay in lieu of notice. I always check the contract terms and ensure compliance with both statutory and contractual entitlements.
Employers who follow legal obligations avoid disputes, maintain morale, and protect the business from reputational harm. Understanding how employment law and redundancy intersect ensures long-term compliance and resilience.
For Free Employment Law Advice for Employers Call John Bloor at EBS Law on 01625 87 4400
Before beginning a redundancy process, I advise clients to build a clear business case. Identify the reasons, the roles affected, and the expected outcome. Effective planning helps avoid mistakes and ensures every decision aligns with employment law and redundancy rules.
Honest communication reduces uncertainty and mistrust. I always recommend giving employees as much information as possible at each stage. During consultation, listen to feedback and explore alternatives such as reduced hours or redeployment.
Employers must apply the same scoring method to all employees in the selection pool. This keeps the process fair and defendable. Avoid criteria that could indirectly discriminate or cause confusion.
Redundancy should always be the last resort. I help clients identify alternatives such as flexible working, voluntary redundancy, or transferring staff to other roles. These steps can reduce the number of compulsory redundancies and preserve talent.
Employers who approach redundancies with fairness and empathy maintain trust and reduce the risk of claims. Employment law and redundancy processes must reflect transparency, logic, and respect for employee rights.
I regularly see employers skip or rush the consultation phase. This is a critical error. You must allow employees to ask questions, propose alternatives, and fully understand the situation. Even where numbers are small, consultation remains essential.
Some employers rely on subjective judgments when selecting employees. Criteria such as ‘attitude’ or ‘team fit’ may appear reasonable but often fail legal scrutiny. I always urge clients to use objective, verifiable scoring systems to protect against claims.
Employers often overlook potential alternatives. You must consider options such as retraining, internal transfers, or part-time roles. Employment law encourages employers to minimise dismissals wherever possible.
Proper records support fair process. I have defended many employers at tribunal by presenting well-documented evidence of how they followed procedure. Inadequate or missing records make it harder to prove fairness and increase legal exposure.
By avoiding these common pitfalls, employers can carry out redundancies lawfully and with confidence. A solid understanding of employment law and redundancy reduces business risk and protects your workforce relationship.
Employers Call John Bloor at EBS Law for Free Employment Law Advice – 01625 87 4400
Employment law and redundancy both become more complex when protected employees are involved. Protected employees include those on maternity leave, with disabilities, or those covered by TUPE. These situations require careful handling and legal advice.
You cannot select an employee for redundancy simply because they are pregnant or on maternity leave. In fact, if a suitable alternative role exists, you must offer it to an employee on maternity leave ahead of others. Failing to do so may constitute automatic unfair dismissal.
If a disabled employee is at risk, you must make reasonable adjustments to avoid placing them at a disadvantage. This could involve changing the selection criteria or modifying roles to make them suitable. I always encourage employers to seek advice early when disabilities are involved.
Redundancies following a TUPE transfer must not relate solely to the transfer. You must demonstrate an economic, technical or organisational (ETO) reason. Otherwise, the dismissal may be automatically unfair.
These situations require heightened sensitivity and detailed planning. I help employers manage them lawfully and with care. Proper treatment protects the business and preserves employee trust.
Some redundancy situations carry more risk and complexity. I advise seeking legal guidance when handling collective redundancies, restructures across multiple locations, or dismissals involving protected employees. Employment law and redundancy rules become more intricate in these contexts.
If you plan to dismiss 20 or more employees within 90 days, you must follow collective redundancy rules. This includes notifying the Insolvency Service, consulting with employee representatives, and following minimum consultation periods. Missing these steps can result in penalties.
When employees challenge the redundancy process, legal advice becomes essential. I support clients through appeals and grievance procedures to ensure a fair resolution and reduce the risk of tribunal claims.
Legal advice helps employers prevent mistakes before they happen. You avoid pitfalls, reduce stress, and show staff that you take fairness seriously. I work with clients to provide practical, cost-effective guidance tailored to their needs.
Employers who invest in legal support during the redundancy process make better decisions and reduce their exposure. Employment law and redundancy will always carry risk, but the right advice protects your business at every step.
Call John Bloor at EBS Law on 01625 87 4400 if you are an employer and need free Employment Law Advice.
Making Employees Redundant: Understanding the Legal Definition